Critical Evalutation on Pacfic Brands Case Study

The management issue, ethical responsibility can be identified when the gild peaceful Brands had announced t get into they were closing all cardinal factories in Australia and moving the manufacturing overseas due to the fact that labor would be much cheaper overseas as well as Australians would be nonrecreational less money for the same clothes. This highlights pacific Brands treat to take the partnership overseas, being negative aspect of ethical responsibility. This selfish act would concord the business a bad name/reputation.A multinational company whitethorn move its manufacturing facility to a developing country to reduce costs. Practices satisfying in that country, such as child labor, poor health and safety, poverty-level pay and coerced employment, will not be tolerated by an ethical company (Lynn MacDonald, 2011). Pacific Brands has displayed no duty to follow a morally correct road with the organization in terms of ethical responsibility. Although It can be argu ed that this action to move overseas would increase employment opportunities overseas.Another management Issue hat can be seen by Pacific Brands Is corporate complaisant responsibility. The earth Image displayed Is not very compulsory as It was evident Pacific Brands portrayed no sense of care for the current 1850 employees that had been working for the company. The company Is now seen as a foreign organization displaying the disadvantages of corporate social responsibility. This Is also not good for the Australian economy as the manufacturing Is through over seas for cheaper labor. Pacific Brands has not embraced responsibility for the companys actions and encourage a positive Impact through their employees.