Cleopatra

The teacher is not a very tough grader. ratiocination summary of her career, but made little use of the simple-minded source available (Plutarch) The word-painting entitled Cleopatra presents a fairly accurate portrayal of the events that transpired from 48 B.C. to 44 B.C in papist floor. From the defeat of Pompey at Pharsalus to Caesars assassination, the painting does a correctly job of presenting the veritable events of the period. The second half of the icon from 44 B.C. to 30 B.C., does not accurately depict the events that occurred. This segment basically dissolves into a love life story, and does not illustrate the actual history of that time. The creators of this movie did have evidence to back up the love interest between Cleopatra and Anthony,and needed to make the movie interest to modern audiences.         There appears to be some project to grab the performers to the actual countenance of Caesar, Anthony, Cicero and Octavian. Howeve r, they failed in casting Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra. Elizabeth Taylor does not resemble the little that is known of the real Cleopatras appearance. From perusing her substitution class on coins and reading the descriptions written by ancient writers, the boilers suit impression of Cleopatra is not one of a beautiful muliebrity.

The customary appearance of Cleopatra is one of a woman with large eyes, a long hooked nose, a quite a prominent chin, and with whisker in a bun at the nape of the neck. Elizabeth Taylor does not fit this description. The ancient writers reveal Cleopatra as possessing great inte lligence,charm,wit, and linguistic skills. ! There are not umteen scenes in this movie that show Cleopatras great intelligence, wit, or her charm. The movie states that she was proficient in seven languages, but in actuality she could confabulation in octette languages. The only way in which Elizabeth Taylor... If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper